Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A59FB22A
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:41:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 41240-06 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:41:44 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from lynet.oppetid.no (oppetid.no [80.65.51.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11CE9FA380
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:41:43 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by lynet.oppetid.no (Postfix, from userid 1019)
	id DA0AA119FA8; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:41:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:41:42 +0200
From: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
To: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: long running transactions
Message-ID: <20061010164142.GA5360@oppetid.no>
References: <20061010161027.GA18908@oppetid.no>
	<25404.1160497420@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20061010163913.GA8097@oppetid.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061010163913.GA8097@oppetid.no>
Organization: Group Nordicbet
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.173 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200610/195
X-Sequence-Number: 21324

[Tobias Brox - Tue at 06:39:13PM +0200]
> Thanks a lot for the quick reply - I've already identified one
> long-running transaction.

belonging to autovacuum ... how come?