Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632DF9FB25F; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 06:53:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67281-10; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:53:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lynet.oppetid.no (oppetid.no [80.65.51.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FD89FA4F4; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 06:53:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: by lynet.oppetid.no (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 6D7B0119EA7; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:52:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:52:59 +0200 From: Tobias Brox To: "Matthew T. O'Connor" Cc: Csaba Nagy , Edoardo Ceccarelli , postgres performance list , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] autovacuum on a -mostly- r/o table Message-ID: <20061015095259.GA24002@oppetid.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Group Nordicbet User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.135 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/97 X-Sequence-Number: 23400 [Matthew T. O'Connor - Wed at 02:33:10PM -0400] > In addition autovacuum respects the work of manual or cron based > vacuums, so if you issue a vacuum right after a daily batch insert / > update, autovacuum won't repeat the work of that manual vacuum. I was experimenting a bit with autovacuum now. To make the least effect possible, I started with a too high cost_delay/cost_limit-ratio. The effect of this was that autovacuum "never" finished the transactions it started with, and this was actually causing the nightly vacuum to not do it's job good enough.