Received: from localhost (pluto.hub.org [200.46.204.4]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376DA9FA5FE for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:48:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87003-08 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:48:44 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from achille.dalibo.net (achille.dalibo.net [212.85.153.230]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59B99FA5C8 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:48:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by achille.dalibo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54C515F60 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:48:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from achille.dalibo.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (achille [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02467-04 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:48:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (cac94-7-82-243-27-82.fbx.proxad.net [82.243.27.82]) by achille.dalibo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E1115F5E for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:48:42 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitri Fontaine Organization: dalibo To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:49:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061102160057.GA26580@oppetid.no> <454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com> In-Reply-To: <454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14913813.DM7pmAy4zv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611071149.07756.dim@dalibo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at dalibo.com X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200611/79 X-Sequence-Number: 21849 --nextPart14913813.DM7pmAy4zv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Le lundi 6 novembre 2006 21:47, Brian Hurt a =E9crit=A0: > So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy > benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the > problem? I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I > can use that as a comparison point- "look, we're getting 1/3rd the read > speed of a single SATA drive- this sucks!" > > Any advice? Tsung is an easy to use open-source multi-protocol distributed load testing= =20 tool. The more simple way to use it to stress test your machine would be=20 using pgfouine to setup a test from postgresql logs: http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/ http://pgfouine.projects.postgresql.org/tsung.html Tsung will easily simulate a lot (more than 1000) of concurrent users playi= ng=20 your custom defined load scenario. Then it will give you some plots to=20 analyze results, for disk io though you'll have to use some other tool(s)=20 while tests are running. Regards, =2D-=20 Dimitri Fontaine http://www.dalibo.com/ --nextPart14913813.DM7pmAy4zv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFUGSjl4JX7QVNfwQRArkiAJ0QL35sDmE89j6/boNVyyOabhA8jwCfRYnZ auxxeBnRoCsAMYyCyWlR+Cg= =Tedh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14913813.DM7pmAy4zv--