Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051649FB5C0
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:44:29 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 22767-03 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:44:20 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from lynet.oppetid.no (oppetid.no [80.65.51.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAAD9FB5A0
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:44:23 -0400 (AST)
Received: by lynet.oppetid.no (Postfix, from userid 1019)
	id A54D711AFAF; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:44:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:44:22 +0100
From: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>, Peter Childs <peterachilds@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Planner statistics, correlations
Message-ID: <20070112104422.GD9703@oppetid.no>
References: <20070112081631.GA10636@oppetid.no>
	<a2de01dd0701120056p37f1906excd71068468e5769a@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070112090500.GB16243@oppetid.no>
	<45A765DE.9020003@enterprisedb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45A765DE.9020003@enterprisedb.com>
Organization: Group Nordicbet
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200701/204
X-Sequence-Number: 22805

[Heikki Linnakangas - Fri at 10:41:34AM +0000]
> I thought about partitioning the table by state, putting rows with 
> state=4 into one partition, and all others to another partition.

That sounds like a good idea - but wouldn't that be costly when changing state?