Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC449FB2E3 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:58:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74934-04 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:58:43 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3FA9FB2E2 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:58:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:1803:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H6RQD-0002rE-Ix; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:58:45 +0100 Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1H6RQ2-0007MJ-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:58:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:58:34 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Florian Weimer Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_trgm performance Message-ID: <20070115125834.GA28248@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: Florian Weimer , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <82mz4k4mt7.fsf@mid.bfk.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82mz4k4mt7.fsf@mid.bfk.de> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.19 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/233 X-Sequence-Number: 22834 On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:16:36AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Am I missing something? Or are trigrams just a poor match for my data > set? Are the individual strings too long, maybe? FWIW, I've seen the same results with 8.1.x. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/