Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834879FBA69 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:49:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01340-01 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:49:30 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE689FB1CB for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:44:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:44:38 -0500 id 00056498.45ED7046.00013F16 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:44:37 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Bricklen Anderson , "Ravindran G-TLS,Chennai." , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Arun Prasad S-TLS,Chennai." Subject: Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility Message-Id: <20070306084437.1f52c123.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200703060222.l262MLi09584@momjian.us> References: <45ECCFCA.2010501@presinet.com> <200703060222.l262MLi09584@momjian.us> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.19 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/127 X-Sequence-Number: 23532 In response to Bruce Momjian : > Bricklen Anderson wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Ravindran G-TLS,Chennai. wrote: > > >> Note: Please bear with us for the disclaimer because it is automated in > > >> the exchange server. > > >> Regards, > > >> Ravi > > > > > > FYI, we are getting closer to rejecting any email with such a > > > disclaimer, or emailing you back every time saying we are ignoring the > > > disclaimer. > > > > I think this issue cropped up a year or two ago, and one of the > > suggestions was for the offender to simply put a link back to their > > disclaimer at the foot of their email, rather than that uber-verbose > > message. > > Right. The problem is that most of the posters have no control over > their footers --- it is added by their email software. I'm curious, what problem does the disclaimer cause? I wrote the following TOS for my personal system: https://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/9 Excerpt of the relevant part: "If you send me email, you are granting me the unrestricted right to use the contents of that email however I see fit, unless otherwise agreed in writing beforehand. You have no rights to the privacy of any email that you send me. If I feel the need, I will forward emails to authorities or make their contents publicly available. By sending me email you consent to this policy and agree that it overrides any disclaimers or policies that may exist elsewhere." I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is undefined. Don't know if this addresses the issue or confuses it ... ? -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.