Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40929FA2EF for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:09:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00531-08 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:09:25 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BD69FA349 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:09:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-221-219-96.bk12-dsl.surnet.cl [201.221.219.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2MG9PQS003269; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:09:25 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F5EC329EA; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:09:19 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:09:19 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Dimitri Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum Message-ID: <20070322160919.GL4102@alvh.no-ip.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dimitri , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> <200703221605.38460.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> <20070322151243.GH4102@alvh.no-ip.org> <200703221655.03068.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200703221655.03068.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2865/Sun Mar 18 08:27:48 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200703/335 X-Sequence-Number: 23740 Dimitri escribió: > But of course it will be much more cool to have something like: > > vacuumdb -a -P parallel_degree > > What do you think? ;) I think our time is better spent enhancing autovacuum ... but if you feel like improving vacuumdb, be my guest. This discussion belongs into pgsql-hackers though, and any patches you may feel like submitting for review should go to pgsql-patches. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support