Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397869FB6F2 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:20:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96795-04 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:20:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1238D9FB5F2 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:19:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-221-221-161.bk12-dsl.surnet.cl [201.221.221.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l34DJN6s006126; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 06:19:28 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6E71329EE; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:19:20 -0400 (CLT) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:19:20 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Andreas Kostyrka Cc: Peter Kovacs , "david@lang.hm" , Geoff Tolley , Ron , "jason@ohloh.net" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA Message-ID: <20070404131920.GA8549@alvh.no-ip.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Kostyrka , Peter Kovacs , "david@lang.hm" , Geoff Tolley , Ron , "jason@ohloh.net" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <9C0858F5-0A48-4AF9-80FF-E4BA14F0F965@ohloh.net> <4613053F.5070401@polimetrix.com> <20070404124640.GC20893@andi-lap.la.revver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070404124640.GC20893@andi-lap.la.revver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.5/2987/Sat Mar 31 20:15:28 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:19:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/62 X-Sequence-Number: 23939 Andreas Kostyrka escribió: > * Peter Kovacs [070404 14:40]: > > This may be a silly question but: will not 3 times as many disk drives > > mean 3 times higher probability for disk failure? Also rumor has it > > that SATA drives are more prone to fail than SCSI drivers. More > > failures will result, in turn, in more administration costs. > Actually, the newest research papers show that all discs (be it > desktops, or highend SCSI) have basically the same failure statistics. > > But yes, having 3 times the discs will increase the fault probability. ... of individual disks, which is quite different from failure of a disk array (in case there is one). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.