Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42FD9FBE07 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 09:48:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00925-07 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 09:47:57 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAE19FB643 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 09:48:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([72.66.0.236]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JHI00M19OVVKX67@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 07:47:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B781F816 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 08:47:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath.home.mathom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZmUzTLcTnbpS for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 08:47:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E155E1F814; Fri, 04 May 2007 08:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 08:47:53 -0400 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: pg_stat_* collection In-reply-to: To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20070504124752.GK2422@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mathom.us X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 References: <88daf38c0705030752sa4e38c3h78bcb64a651e6b1a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/43 X-Sequence-Number: 24433 On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:53:55AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: >It's also completely inappropriate for any environment I work in, because >there really is no thought of security whatsoever in the whole thing. That makes it sound more like snmp, not less. :-) Mike Stone