Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF739FC069 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:36:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17269-03 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:36:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968369FBF8D for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:36:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:36:38 -0400 id 0005641D.465ECF66.00007A0C Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:36:37 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Ireneusz Pluta Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: DB cluster sharing between 32 and 64 bit software versions Message-Id: <20070531093637.6c536dca.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <465ECBE4.9020600@wp.pl> References: <465ECBE4.9020600@wp.pl> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/637 X-Sequence-Number: 25027 In response to Ireneusz Pluta : > Hello, > > I am going to build a new PostgreSQL dedicated server, on FreeBSD. Before it goes to production > service I need to make some tests and take configuration decisions, focused on my application needs. > Usual thing. One of them is selection of one of 32 or 64 bit versions of both OS and PG. What I am > going to do is to install both versions on different filesystems of the same machine. As a > consequence I would also have to deal with two independent copies of my real databases on which I > want to perfrom my tests. However, the databases are rather large, so I am thinking about > possibilities of not to have to restore two copies of my data, but use just one instead, and sharing > it between the 32 and 64 versions, across reboots. > > Would that scenario work, or I am simply too naive considering it? It won't work, unfortunately. The on-disk representation of the data is different between ia32 and amd64. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023