Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A209FA202 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:49:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68335-05-5 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:48:58 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mail.texom.com (sd-6100.dedibox.fr [88.191.35.50]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AA59FA2F6 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:49:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.texom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A65B94012; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.texom.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.texom.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09556-09; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dalistar.local (cac94-7-82-243-27-82.fbx.proxad.net [82.243.27.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.texom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C28C94007; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:48:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitri Fontaine To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Linux mis-reporting memory Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:48:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Decibel! References: <20070920230400.GM95343@decibel.org> In-Reply-To: <20070920230400.GM95343@decibel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709211148.51647.dfontaine@hi-media.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at texom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/350 X-Sequence-Number: 26895 Hi, Le Friday 21 September 2007 01:04:01 Decibel!, vous avez =E9crit=A0: > I'm finding this rather interesting report from top on a Debian box... I've read from people in other free software development groups that top/ps= =20 memory usage outputs are not useful not trustable after all. A more usable= =20 (or precise or trustworthy) tool seems to be exmap: http://www.berthels.co.uk/exmap/ Hope this helps, =2D-=20 dim