Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88E137B9FC for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:44:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52977-01 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:43:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD8E37B7F4 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:43:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:1803:20e:cff:fe36:a766] helo=trofast.sesse.net) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IrMT2-0006cN-Ps for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:43:53 +0100 Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IrMT2-0000XF-8K for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:43:52 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:43:52 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20071111234352.GE1894@uio.no> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org References: <47344D43.5090506@geri.cc.fer.hr> <47347F9F.1070309@laliluna.de> <20071109140454.924e94b1.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <4734B884.9080501@cheapcomplexdevices.com> <5482c80a0711111127i79cfe651n4109a9fe3667b852@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5482c80a0711111127i79cfe651n4109a9fe3667b852@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.20.4 on a x86_64 X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/171 X-Sequence-Number: 27586 On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:27:02PM +0100, Dimitri wrote: > As well to demonstrate OS parallelism it's not so impressive to see > 4CPU server results rather 8CPU or 32threaded Niagara... Don't know > why they did not present similar performance graphs for these > platform, strange no?... I guess it's because their Niagara support is still very raw, and besides, it's not a very common platform. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/