Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:04:20 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Trevor Talbot <quension@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows.
Message-ID: <20071114000420.GJ19014@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20071112190833.GY32349@crankycanuck.ca>
	<4739BD65.9070605@verizon.net>
	<20071113152111.GG11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A0023.5020609@verizon.net>
	<20071113213510.GF11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A1DC3.3070608@verizon.net>
	<20071113221028.GH11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A2EAD.9040107@verizon.net>
	<20071113235133.GI19014@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<90bce5730711131559k7786564eve2a3e9dd9596377a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <90bce5730711131559k7786564eve2a3e9dd9596377a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)

Trevor Talbot escribió:
> On 11/13/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> > > Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > > > I'm not a private support organisation; please send your replies to the
> > > > list, not me.
> > >
> > > Sorry. Most of the lists I send to have ReplyTo set, but a few do not.
> > > And then I forget.
> >
> > If you use "reply to all", it works wonderfully in both cases.
> 
> Then it upsets the people who don't want to get private copies, only
> list copies, on most of the Reply-To lists.
> 
> There's no winning :(

I am on a couple of mailing lists with Reply-To set, and what my MUA
does is put only the list on the To:, so there is no extra private copy.
I use "reply-to-group" all the time and it works perfectly well.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                         http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"PHP is what I call the "Dumb Monkey" language. [A]ny dumb monkey can code
something in PHP. Python takes actual thought to produce something useful."
                                                               (J. Drake)