Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7A52E15CD
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 96484-10 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:06 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.planetcobalt.net (mail.planetcobalt.net [217.10.9.49])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440772E17F6
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: by mail.planetcobalt.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B31BE3C00084; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:11:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:11:03 +0100
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <lists@planetcobalt.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows.
Message-ID: <20071114001103.GA20319@mail.planetcobalt.net>
References: <20071112190833.GY32349@crankycanuck.ca>
	<4739BD65.9070605@verizon.net>
	<20071113152111.GG11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A0023.5020609@verizon.net>
	<20071113213510.GF11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A1DC3.3070608@verizon.net>
	<20071113221028.GH11563@crankycanuck.ca>
	<473A2EAD.9040107@verizon.net>
	<20071113235133.GI19014@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<90bce5730711131559k7786564eve2a3e9dd9596377a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <90bce5730711131559k7786564eve2a3e9dd9596377a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/205
X-Sequence-Number: 27620

On 2007-11-13 Trevor Talbot wrote:
> On 11/13/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>>> Sorry. Most of the lists I send to have ReplyTo set, but a few do
>>> not. And then I forget.
>>
>> If you use "reply to all", it works wonderfully in both cases.
> 
> Then it upsets the people who don't want to get private copies, only
> list copies, on most of the Reply-To lists.
> 
> There's no winning :(

Unless you use a mailer that supports Reply, Group-Reply, *and*
List-Reply. ;)

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
-- 
"The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it
seriously inconveniences the user."
--http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html