Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8DD2E412F for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:20:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58964-05 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:19:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD9E2E4130 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:20:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([72.83.241.108]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JTF00LUA7CYADK4@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:19:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F346E6AD for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:19:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath.home.mathom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T7uZGC6nX43K for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:19:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF7986FC27; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:19:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:19:43 -0500 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: viewing source code In-reply-to: <1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762112A4F@nrtexcus702.int.asurion.com> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20071221221941.GG5294@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mathom.us X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 References: <1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762112A4F@nrtexcus702.int.asurion.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/351 X-Sequence-Number: 28167 On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:02:57PM -0600, Roberts, Jon wrote: >I'm tired of arguing. You win. I still say this I a needed feature if you >want adoption for enterprise level databases in larger companies. The >security out of the box is not enough What a classic "I want this, and if it isn't implemented postgres sucks" argument. Mike Stone