Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334A12E02ED for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:21:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48766-05-4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:21:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09F2E3130 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:21:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([71.178.47.70]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JUI00IUP8ZX9U51@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:21:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042551F81D for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:21:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath.home.mathom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Gq51XukKBs3M for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:21:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C31E11F812; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:21:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:21:29 -0500 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: Best way to index IP data? In-reply-to: <20080111155211.20933fc1@commandprompt.com> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20080112002126.GZ5294@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mathom.us X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 References: <20080111162747.GT5294@mathom.us> <24044.1200082058@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080111212703.GU5294@mathom.us> <20080111213710.GD8260@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080111220235.GX5294@mathom.us> <20080111222403.GA7527@crankycanuck.ca> <1259C7B1-C948-4326-B827-849C64B61A16@blighty.com> <20080111230055.GB7618@crankycanuck.ca> <00045B34-A238-46B9-8641-C0A40C5CCCE5@blighty.com> <20080111155211.20933fc1@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200801/90 X-Sequence-Number: 28329 On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:52:11PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >Steve I think you are speaking of practicality and implementation >versus RFC compliance. I believe per the RFC Andrew is correct. There's an RFC for storing IPs in a database? Mike Stone