Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5002E0341 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:04:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11342-01-2 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:04:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB60D2E034C for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:04:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([71.178.47.70]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JUI00CUOAZH73F0@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:04:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF841F81D for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath.home.mathom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id m3SEVghBVCFR for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B1041F80E; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:04:25 -0500 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: Best way to index IP data? In-reply-to: <20080111164318.665c820a@commandprompt.com> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20080112010423.GB5294@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mathom.us X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 References: <20080111212703.GU5294@mathom.us> <20080111213710.GD8260@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080111220235.GX5294@mathom.us> <20080111222403.GA7527@crankycanuck.ca> <1259C7B1-C948-4326-B827-849C64B61A16@blighty.com> <20080111230055.GB7618@crankycanuck.ca> <00045B34-A238-46B9-8641-C0A40C5CCCE5@blighty.com> <20080111155211.20933fc1@commandprompt.com> <20080112002126.GZ5294@mathom.us> <20080111164318.665c820a@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200801/95 X-Sequence-Number: 28334 On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:43:18PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >Sigh. No. But there is an RFC that declare how IPs are denoted and used. Sigh, I'm honestly curious about what RFC says that endpoint IPs must have netmasks associated with them. Mike Stone