Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021A52E3219 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:12:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93555-02 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:12:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EA62E3205 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:12:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([71.178.47.70]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JUN00AOD0DV8H64@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:03:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BFD56A1E; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:12:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osgiliath.home.mathom.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5phi+h8WT50C; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:12:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28DA756A04; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:12:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:12:01 -0500 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: Best way to index IP data? In-reply-to: <82ir1wfqoo.fsf@mid.bfk.de> To: Florian Weimer Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Mail-followup-to: Florian Weimer , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-id: <20080114141159.GF5294@mathom.us> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mathom.us X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88 References: <20080111162747.GT5294@mathom.us> <24044.1200082058@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080111212703.GU5294@mathom.us> <20080111213710.GD8260@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080111220235.GX5294@mathom.us> <20080111222403.GA7527@crankycanuck.ca> <1259C7B1-C948-4326-B827-849C64B61A16@blighty.com> <827iicizg7.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <20080114111921.GE5294@mathom.us> <82ir1wfqoo.fsf@mid.bfk.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200801/115 X-Sequence-Number: 28354 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >Hmm. It's an argument for a separate CIDR type, not against a host >type. I don't think anyone argued against the CIDR type. :-) Mike Stone