Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9932E0156 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:57:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73092-05 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:56:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06292E014C for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:56:58 -0400 (AST) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO [192.168.2.3]) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 15305497 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:55:23 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL @ Sun To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: HOT TOAST? Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:50:15 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802130950.15431.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.636 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.442, BAYES_50=0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200802/144 X-Sequence-Number: 28686 Folks, Does anyone know if HOT is compatible with pg_toast tables, or do TOASTed rows simply get excluded from HOT? I can run some tests, but if someone knows this off the top of their heads it would save me some time. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco