Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999B42E01A9 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:21:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20546-03-7 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:21:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-7-245-234.eastlink.ca [71.7.245.234]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2043C2E00D1 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:19:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205C08C564; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:19:57 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:19:57 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Gregory Stark cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: off-topic: SPAM In-Reply-To: <87prsf6tbk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> Message-ID: <20080424151704.I41681@fserv.hub.org> References: <87lk338olw.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <20080424103344.A41681@fserv.hub.org> <34b60eee0804240754j47c9a020y96e5e57dd28367d8@mail.gmail.com> <20080424134308.G41681@fserv.hub.org> <20080424165110.GB15631@alvh.no-ip.org> <87prsf6tbk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Archive-Number: 200804/260 X-Sequence-Number: 15008 On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Alvaro Herrera" writes: > >> Marc G. Fournier escribi=F3: >>> >>> where are the reports going to? am I missing off a list somewhere? >>> >>> of course, your response really didn't enlighten me any ... what is the >>> problem that is being seen / reported ? >> >> The problem is that any time some posts to pgsql-performance he gets a >> bounce from a postmaster in infotecnica.com.br domain. >> >> It has been reported in several lists: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2007-12/msg00203.php >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-12/msg00697.php >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-12/msg00126.php > > The only way we're going to solve this is to send a personalized email to > every subscriber of pgsql-performance. We might be able to get away with = just > doing brazilian subscribers first and hope it's one of those. That would only be 42 email addresses, so not *too* painful, but if their= =20 email requires a 'challenge-response' to send to them, how did they get=20 subscribed in the first place, as our subscribe method is=20 'challenge-response' also, which means they have to receive the email we=20 send to them automaticalloy in the first place ... So, are these a result of forwarding, vs direct subscription?=