Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5B32E0067 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:21:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02054-06 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:21:23 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (smtp.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.141]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6692E0063 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:21:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=crankycanuck.ca) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1JpPjT-00064h-57 for pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:21:03 -0400 Received: by crankycanuck.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D861F50149; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:20:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:20:53 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Sun Talks about MySQL Message-ID: <20080425152053.GE19447@crankycanuck.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org References: <480F8C2D.6010806@emproshunts.com> <4811D1DD.9030401@otg-nc.com> <20080425130105.GA19447@crankycanuck.ca> <36e682920804250741p33d621f3gf35e6bdebe2e0531@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36e682920804250741p33d621f3gf35e6bdebe2e0531@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/134 X-Sequence-Number: 13860 On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:41:24AM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > Not to rain on my MySQL/Sun bash parade, but your response is based on > the extremely poor assumption that Sun would put 100 developers on a > single project. I was certainly being a little glib, but I do think the original statement is fatuous. Adding 100 developers to a single product like MySQL -- or, for that matter, to 20 small projects all working on some feature for MySQL or even to 20 small projects all aimed at some sort of application that is supposed to work eith MySQL -- presents a pretty serious management hurdle, and one that I don't actually think can be leapt in a single bound. Therefore the claim that the sudden addition of 100 developers who know about databases to the MySQL "stable" will result in sudden increases in innovation is nonsense. It'll play to the kind of managers who believe in throwing people at a problem, of course -- and I've worked for plenty of them in my life. The claim, however, was really part of the bigger claim that the transition from small-distributed-company to organic-part-of-Sun is over: that was the real message in those comments. This, too, I find incredible. Either it's a happy face for the public, or else the honeymoon isn't over. Integrating sudden infusions of people into a strongly developed (some pronounce that "ossified") culture like Sun's takes rather more time than has passed so far, no matter how compatible the cultures seem on the surface. Power relationships do not change that fast in human societies, ever. By way of comparison, the most obviously successful absorbtion of this type Sun ever did was StarOffice, and it would be pretty hard to argue that that project was either an unmitigated victory or a fast integration. A