Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4902364FCE1 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:59:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10022-07 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:59:30 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: delayed 00:31:05.391374 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no (cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FADE64FCD8 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:59:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trivini.no ([2001:700:300:1800::b] helo=redskapet.trivini.no) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KL07N-00037L-Lu for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:19 +0200 Received: from berge by redskapet.trivini.no with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KL07L-0001gx-SJ for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:17 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:28:15 +0200 From: Berge Schwebs =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rlo?= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: <20080721182815.GY10783@trivini.no> References: <4a74ba520807211120u46fd23f2lc72059ad94c04324@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4a74ba520807211120u46fd23f2lc72059ad94c04324@mail.gmail.com> X-Header-Virus: I'm a header virus, put me in your headers too! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: berge@trivini.no Subject: Re: [BACKUPS]Little backups X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on redskapet.trivini.no) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200807/193 X-Sequence-Number: 30793 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:20:27PM -0300, Leví Teodoro da Silva wrote: > - In oracle he makes a full backup two times in a day. In this range of > time, Oracle make a lot of mini-backups, but this backups is about just the > data whose have changed in this time. If the system fails, he could > reconstruct the database adding the last "big backup" with "mini-backups". > Can Postgres do this ? * Take a look at Point-In-Time-Recovery, PITR: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html -Berge -- Berge Schwebs Bjørlo Alegría!