Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE465010B for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:26:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58798-07 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:26:48 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net (tamriel.snowman.net [72.66.115.51]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD3964FC00 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:26:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8092E222A5; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:26:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:26:47 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: DelGurth Cc: Tomasz Ostrowski , Mikkel H?gh , pgsql-general Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? Message-ID: <20081016152647.GI4452@tamriel.snowman.net> Mail-Followup-To: DelGurth , Tomasz Ostrowski , Mikkel H?gh , pgsql-general References: <48F4F053.1060201@hagander.net> <7438A981-4B6A-4E5A-A1E0-50432CDEFB00@hoegh.org> <48F6EE94.8010904@batory.org.pl> <4BE94DFB-8917-4175-9083-7DEABC30BD7F@hoegh.org> <48F70157.7010601@batory.org.pl> <20081016144046.GH4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <10268b3e0810160809l3f16fba3k1d45271fbbe865b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K1SnTjlYS/YgcDEx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10268b3e0810160809l3f16fba3k1d45271fbbe865b@mail.gmail.com> X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Info: http://www.snowman.net X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 11:23:19 up 11 days, 9:42, 18 users, load average: 0.02, 0.05, 0.05 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/691 X-Sequence-Number: 138940 --K1SnTjlYS/YgcDEx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * DelGurth (delgurth@gmail.com) wrote: > Seems Tomasz linked to the wrong patch. The patch he meant was: > http://drupal.org/files/issues/drupal_lookup_path-6.x.patch.txt That's much better. > Also nice to see people "benchmark" differences by just executing a > query once[2][3].... This thread is insane.. Is every change to drupal run through this kind of design-by-committee? And the paranoia of a cost difference of 0.09ms for something which ends up getting cached for one particular storage engine under one particular database?! Makes me worried about drupal's future, heh. Stephen --K1SnTjlYS/YgcDEx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj3XTcACgkQrzgMPqB3kigVNACcCMoW8OmGuzwhvZJ6aPB5uPhi 9IYAnj9SdzKE+vPv3QUbGMqVBK5Du7/j =Zht5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K1SnTjlYS/YgcDEx--