Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5A064FCD5 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:42:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38457-06 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:42:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A567864FC71 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:42:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from commandprompt.com (CPE001b63afe888-CM001adea9c5a6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.211.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9HCkneO031899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:46:52 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:42:46 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To Message-ID: <20081017124245.GA7198@commandprompt.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-general@postgresql.org References: <48F70157.7010601@batory.org.pl> <20081016144046.GH4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <10268b3e0810160809l3f16fba3k1d45271fbbe865b@mail.gmail.com> <20081016152647.GI4452@tamriel.snowman.net> <4F39EAE4-2C57-4839-8AB7-98AC131C0C4A@hoegh.org> <48F85CED.7000009@batory.org.pl> <6D3E0C6E-B2F4-4BAF-92E0-46C4EAE4D51B@hoegh.org> <48F867EE.5040403@batory.org.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/749 X-Sequence-Number: 138998 On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:02:57PM +0200, Mikkel Høgh wrote: > Yay, even more manual labour instead of having the computers doing the work > for us. What's your next suggestion, go back to pen and paper? My suggestion would be to use a mail user agent that knows how to read the list headers, which were standardized many years ago. Then you "reply to list". Mutt has done this for at least a few years now. I don't know about other MUAs. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@commandprompt.com +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/