From: Angel Alvarez <clist@uah.es>
Reply-To: clist@uah.es
Organization: UAH
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:09:04 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
References: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
 <4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com>
In-Reply-To: <4900B39B.2040508@kkmfg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810232009.04806.clist@uah.es>

El Jueves 23 Octubre 2008 Collin Kidder escribi=F3:

> >> horse. =A0Since I use the most advanced e-mail client on the market I =
just=20
> >> work around that the settings here are weird, it does annoy me a bit=20
> >> anytime I stop to think about it though.

What's such most advanced mail reader??

No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, reply=
 to list)=20
in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message.=20

in fact many other mail-list dont have such extended features, as not all o=
f the=20
previous 4 options works as expected. For me this makes postgres lists the =
most
complete about the RFC.

So is about, thunderbird to move forward one step, not to cripple standars =
back.
In fact this remembers me the M$ way of doing things..

Regards, Angel


=2D-=20
=2D-----------------------------------------------
Clist UAH
=2D-----------------------------------------------