From: Angel Alvarez <clist@uah.es>
Reply-To: clist@uah.es
Organization: UAH
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:46:54 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
References: <200810231701.m9NH1ML21995@momjian.us>
	<200810232009.04806.clist@uah.es> <4900C30A.8030604@kkmfg.com>
In-Reply-To: <4900C30A.8030604@kkmfg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810232046.54731.clist@uah.es>

Well

but the RFC's were in fact prior to thunderbird
So for he most of its life, when few people was using it,=20
Thiunderbird was a sad example of your botched attempt of creating a
standar of NOT FOLLOWING THE RFC's...

Well, also M$ thought they invented internet so its a common mistake.

May be you can push Thunderbird guys a bit to include a little more funcion=
ailty
other than complaining others that try to follow what to seemed to be the r=
ight way.

Are we going to try be standars compliant or we keep trying to reinvent the=
 wheel?

Poor RFC people, what a waste of time...

Regards, Angel

El Jueves 23 Octubre 2008 Collin Kidder escribi=F3:
> Angel Alvarez wrote:
> > What's such most advanced mail reader??
> >
> > No one, ive seen, seems to be perfect nor thunderbird.
> > By the way kmail has 4 options (reply, reply to all, reply to author, r=
eply to list)=20
> > in addition to be able to use list headers included in the message.=20
> >
> > in fact many other mail-list dont have such extended features, as not a=
ll of the=20
> > previous 4 options works as expected. For me this makes postgres lists =
the most
> > complete about the RFC.
> >
> > So is about, thunderbird to move forward one step, not to cripple stand=
ars back.
> > In fact this remembers me the M$ way of doing things..
> >
> > Regards, Angel
> >
> >
> >  =20
>=20
> One could argue that a standard which is respected by nobody but a few=20
> people from this list is NOT a standard but rather a botched attempt at=20
> creating a standard which no one wanted.
>=20


=2D-=20
Ning=FAn personajillo ha sido vilipendiado si no es necesario. El 'buen rol=
lo' est=E1 en nuestras manos.
=2D>>-----------------------------------------------
    Clist UAH a.k.a Angel
=2D--------------------------------[www.uah.es]-<<--
"BIG BANG: =E1tomo primigenio que, debido a una incorrecta manipulaci=F3n p=
or parte de Dios, explot=F3 y provoc=F3 una tremenda algarada en el vac=EDo=
, raz=F3n por la que, a=FAn hoy, las empresas aseguradoras no quieren ni o=
=EDr hablar de Dios."