Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADAC64FE3B for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:01:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66348-06 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:01:49 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E0364FE21 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:01:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-20-64.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.20.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBNC6MEP022312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:25 -0800 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B1FF47CCE; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:01:07 -0300 (CLST) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:01:06 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Mark Wong Cc: Gregory Stark , "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" , Selena Deckelmann , Gabrielle Roth Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5 Message-ID: <20081223120106.GC6217@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <70c01d1d0812201654i5f55150ep619a6c7ff094470@mail.gmail.com> <87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <552F108E-9732-4ED6-B45D-6C651C63565E@gmail.com> <87d4fkvgtj.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <70c01d1d0812220050kb1f755etea3ecada3f3b8631@mail.gmail.com> <871vw0v5ot.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <70c01d1d0812221936o57e54ec1j20b15309141672d5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <70c01d1d0812221936o57e54ec1j20b15309141672d5@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200812/201 X-Sequence-Number: 32237 Mark Wong escribió: > Hrm, tracking just the launcher process certainly doesn't help. Are > the spawned processed short lived? I take a snapshot of > /proc//io data every 60 seconds. The worker processes can be short-lived, but if they are, obviously they are not vacuuming the large tables. If you want to track all autovacuum actions, change autovacuum_log_min_messages to 0. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support