Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A01B632992 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:14:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67594-05 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:14:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC0263296B for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:14:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o5EBERC02420; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:14:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled In-Reply-To: <201006132357.o5DNvdi18873@momjian.us> To: Bruce Momjian Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:14:27 -0400 (EDT) CC: Alvaro Herrera , Tom Lane , Max Williams , lacey.powers@commandprompt.com, PostgreSQL-development , "Joshua D. Drake" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.489 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URI_NOVOWEL=0.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/770 X-Sequence-Number: 164400 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010: > > > > > > > > > Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this. Loudly. > > > > > It's a serious packaging error. > > > > > > > > Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working > > > > on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience. > > > > > > [ Thread moved to hackers. 8.4.4 RPMs were built with debug flags. ] > > > > > > Uh, where are we on this? Has it been completed? How are people > > > informed about this? Do we need to post to the announce email list? > > > Does Yum just update them? How did this mistake happen? How many days > > > did it take to detect the problem? > > > > > > Why has no news been posted here? > > > > > > https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/news > > > > Why have I received no reply to this email? Do people think this is not > > a serious issue? I know it is a weekend but the problem was identified > > on Thursday, meaning there was a full workday for someone from > > CommandPrompt to reply to the issue and report a status: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00165.php > > [ Updated subject line.] > > I am on IM with Joshua Drake right now and am working to get answers to > the questions above. He or I will report in the next few hours. > > FYI, only Command Prompt-produced RPMs are affected. Devrim's RPMs are > not: > > http://yum.postgresqlrpms.org/ I have still seen no public report about this, 12 hours after talking to Josh Drake on IM about it. :-( -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +