Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF24633F8A for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:12:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38441-09 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:12:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from vexbert.mr-paradox.net (vexbert.mr-paradox.net [198.145.180.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5AC633E9E for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:12:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: by vexbert.mr-paradox.net (Postfix, from userid 18391) id CE3FB845F8; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:12:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:12:30 -0700 From: David Kerr To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Kevin Grittner , Greg Smith , pgsql-performance , Tom Lane Subject: Re: pgbench could not send data to client: Broken pipe Message-ID: <20100909151230.GA96375@mr-paradox.net> References: <20100908195654.GB49941@mr-paradox.net> <9771.1283978128@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20100908204443.GG49941@mr-paradox.net> <4C87B22802000025000353B7@gw.wicourts.gov> <20100908212056.GI49941@mr-paradox.net> <4C87BF0502000025000353BE@gw.wicourts.gov> <20100908220011.GA59539@mr-paradox.net> <4C87C77C02000025000353D2@gw.wicourts.gov> <20100908222959.GB59539@mr-paradox.net> <1284043050-sup-4975@alvh.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1284043050-sup-4975@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/43 X-Sequence-Number: 40246 On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:38:16AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: - Excerpts from David Kerr's message of miƩ sep 08 18:29:59 -0400 2010: - - > Thanks for the insight. we're currently in performance testing of the - > app. Currently, the JVM is the bottleneck, once we get past that - > i'm sure it will be the database at which point I'll have the kind - > of data you're talking about. - - Hopefully you're not running the JVM stuff in the same machine. Nope, this server is 100% allocated to the database. Dave