Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3991337B50
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  6 Oct 2010 22:30:20 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 87806-04
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  7 Oct 2010 01:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from tamriel.snowman.net (tamriel.snowman.net [72.66.115.51])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE72F1337B79
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  6 Oct 2010 22:30:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A521A22290; Wed,  6 Oct 2010 21:30:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:30:12 -0400
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to
	48)performance
Message-ID: <20101007013012.GN26232@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <AANLkTimW2UgVPGw6MRUBj9HabvwmsmkZasL3hKv-nUJ2@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101004175545.GA2690@csail.mit.edu>
	<4CAA21C7.1030701@agliodbs.com> <i8itbn$kre$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<AANLkTikXHJL+u9OdgiqCBQLB-bMcrkZeB1eEeyZqBPvA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3X8HaB+/xMECYZdj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikXHJL+u9OdgiqCBQLB-bMcrkZeB1eEeyZqBPvA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64 (x86_64)
X-Uptime: 21:29:43 up 405 days, 12:54, 14 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.05,
	0.02
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201010/47
X-Sequence-Number: 40466


--3X8HaB+/xMECYZdj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hey, I didn't know about those.  That sounds like it might be worth
> investigating, though I confess I lack a 48-core machine on which to
> measure the alleged benefit.

I've got a couple 24-core systems, if it'd be sufficiently useful to
test with..

	Stephen

--3X8HaB+/xMECYZdj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkytIqQACgkQrzgMPqB3kijOVQCfbNWaFFuADcG5SpKm7DJ4HkCy
CdsAnilYKPRAKaUShd5UPFz2eKDnkpvC
=x7W6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3X8HaB+/xMECYZdj--