Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3237A1336FA7 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:22:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16560-05 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:21:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from locust.cns.vt.edu (locust.cns.vt.edu [198.82.169.14]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBF5133616B for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:21:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: by locust.cns.vt.edu (Postfix, from userid 986) id 07A72118A67; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:21:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:21:57 -0400 From: Ray Stell To: Divakar Singh Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle Message-ID: <20101025192157.GB14620@cns.vt.edu> References: <402913.53404.qm@web65405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <20101025183523.GA14620@cns.vt.edu> <925479.22016.qm@web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <925479.22016.qm@web65411.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201010/409 X-Sequence-Number: 40827 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:39:30AM -0700, Divakar Singh wrote: > Thanks Ray, > Already seen that, but it does not tell about storage requirement compared to > Oracle. I find it takes 2 times space than oracle. > > > Best Regards, > Divakar > ________________________________ > From: Ray Stell > To: Divakar Singh > Sent: Tue, October 26, 2010 12:05:23 AM > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgres insert performance and storage requirement > compared to Oracle > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:12:40AM -0700, Divakar Singh wrote: > > > > 2. What are the average storage requirements of postgres compared to Oracle? I > > > inserted upto 1 million records. The storage requirement of postgreSQL is > >almost > > > > double than that of Oracle. > > there's a fine manual: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/storage.html Maybe compare to oracle's storage documentation: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/sql_elements001.htm#SQLRF30020 http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17120/schema007.htm#ADMIN11622 I don't believe for a second the byte count is double in pg, but that's just a religious expression, I've never counted.