Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeXME-0005tt-PR for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:38:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeXMD-0002Kj-Q0 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:38:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeXMC-0002Kd-Ns for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:38:44 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeXM9-0000G2-L7 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:38:43 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeXM6-0003Dh-Iz; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:38:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:38:38 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Shaun Thomas Cc: Ben Chobot , pgsql-performance Subject: Re: shared_buffers on ubuntu precise Message-ID: <20121130203838.GA27151@momjian.us> References: <20121130012426.69300@gmx.com> <855F8817-6C9A-4EFB-BB80-752BF7B73B56@autouncle.com> <50B8BC7F.4000005@optionshouse.com> <5F52712E-C339-4DF2-9EE5-A26643CEA2C2@autouncle.com> <50B8CA01.5040405@optionshouse.com> <50B8D98C.8050507@optionshouse.com> <1C168A4E-67B8-40A3-9C45-C79CA363564C@silentmedia.com> <50B910A9.7000406@optionshouse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B910A9.7000406@optionshouse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:01:45PM -0600, Shaun Thomas wrote: > On 11/30/2012 01:57 PM, Ben Chobot wrote: > > >Hm, this sounds like something we should look into. Before we start > >digging do you have more to share, or did you leave it with the "huh, > >that's weird; this seems to fix it" solution? > > We're still testing. We're still on the -31 kernel. We tried the -33 > kernel which *might* fix it, but then this happened: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084264 > > So now we're testing -34 which is currently proposed. Either way, > it's pretty clear that Ubuntu's choice of patches to backport is > rather eclectic and a little wonky, or that nailing down load > calculations went awry since the NOHZ stuff started, or both. At > this point, I wish we'd stayed on CentOS. Or Debian. Not sure what would justify use of Ubuntu as a server, except wanting to have the exact same OS as their personal computers. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance