Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:55:26 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
Cc: Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com>,
	postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres upgrade, security release, where?
Message-ID: <20130402005526.GA1491@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CAEaSS0YtzGTONbnDWUsvWukD_zZH6U77AQe_=vneysMX4LsdXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130402002706.GA11287@momjian.us>
	<CAB8KJ=gA-6yZNgqpq8oCqNm7rzqtSaXWcQ9=fnnnJnAKtpd9EA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB8KJ=gA-6yZNgqpq8oCqNm7rzqtSaXWcQ9=fnnnJnAKtpd9EA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

On Tue, Apr  2, 2013 at 09:40:07AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> > Due to the security nature of the release, the source and binaries will
> > only be publicly available on April 4 --- there are no pre-release
> > versions available.
> 
> The PostgreSQL homepage has a big announcement saying
> "PostgreSQL minor versions released!", including a mention of a
> "security issue";
> unfortunately it's not obvious that this is for the prior 9.2.3 release and as
> the announcement of the upcoming security release
> ( http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1454/ ) does not mention the
> new release number, methinks there is plenty of room for confusion :(
> 
> It might be an idea to update the "splash box" with details of the upcoming
> release.

I agree updating the "spash box" would make sense.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance