Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:50:18 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
Message-ID: <20130910115018.GD32160@momjian.us>
References: 
 <E1FB7FBAE29E634FA58D6CC0D59F288B3412B59F@CH1PRD0511MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <E1FB7FBAE29E634FA58D6CC0D59F288B3412B59F@CH1PRD0511MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:43:16AM +0000, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> First of all, I'd like to thank you for taking some interest in this
> issue. We'd love to migrate to the latest PG version, but this issue
> is currently preventing us from doing so.
>
> Regardless of the DB used (base application schema _or_ restored DB
> with additional app data + base application schema), seed information
> is present in all tests. I guess my question is this - why would
> having existing data change the bind behavior at all? Is it possible
> that the way indexes are created has changed between 8.4 -> 9.x?

I don't know as you have not shown us exactly what is slower between
versions --- you only said the bug appears or not in certain
circumstances.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance