Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:20:43 +0200
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: "Graeme B. Bell" <graeme.bell@nibio.no>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>,
 postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Hmmm... why does pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly
 when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Message-ID: <20150708112043.GK10242@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <A1B7E390-BE47-4753-8557-D244D0202C25@skogoglandskap.no>
 <CAHyXU0zTimu6+XiNkJCnGTxCdOxWpEZJOEc+REU47T0rHSA_VQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CC0D3193-2420-4813-B230-16E98EC3F05E@skogoglandskap.no>
 <CAHyXU0yzuYdjugieTk3NabXHMwMwkRQ+ZX7nSDyT-h-40+i54g@mail.gmail.com>
 <53BADEB5-F63D-476E-B0E1-CBD826574977@skogoglandskap.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53BADEB5-F63D-476E-B0E1-CBD826574977@skogoglandskap.no>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

On 2015-07-08 11:13:04 +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
> I'm guessing you are maybe pressed for time at the moment because I
> already clearly included this on the last email, as well as the links
> to the alternative benchmarks with the same problem I referred to on
> both of my last emails which are also trivial to drop into pgbench
> (cut/paste).

You realize that you want something here, not Merlin, right?

> e.g. did you see these parts of my previous email 
> 
> "To clear up the issue I build a little test harness around your comment below."
> "http://github.com/gbb/ppppt"

Well, that requires reviewing the source code of the run script and
such.


I think we shouldn't discuss this on two threads (-performance, -bugs),
that makes it hard to follow. Given Tom's more detailed answer I think
the -bugs thread already contains more pertinent information.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance