Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZD9Bh-00022A-SE for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:36:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZD9Bh-0004H3-6F for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:36:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZD99O-0002C1-Cb for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:33:54 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZD99H-0005YY-MB for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:33:53 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (p5DDC6245.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.220.98.69]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE0B5860002; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:33:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:33:46 +0200 From: Andres Freund To: "Graeme B. Bell" Cc: Merlin Moncure , postgres performance list Subject: Re: Hmmm... why does pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Message-ID: <20150709103346.GI340@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <53BADEB5-F63D-476E-B0E1-CBD826574977@skogoglandskap.no> <20150708112043.GK10242@alap3.anarazel.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On 2015-07-09 10:30:35 +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote: > > Well, that requires reviewing the source code of the run script and > > such. > > No, of course it doesn't. It appears that you didn't look at the repo or read my previous mail before you wrote this. FFS, I *ran* some of the tests and reported on results. With you in CC. What I mean is that I don't just run random code from some random github repository. > I do not wish to antagonise you either, so please go and look at the > repo before you write the next reply. Over and out. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance