Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDeM-0004Wb-PV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:12:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDeL-0006KO-9P for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:12:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDeK-0006Fw-TN for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:12:33 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iDDeI-0005VC-Lp for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:12:31 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id v2so171260iob.10 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iCNsGPIH4QTiGVd9umE77TB2gJn+Cr124KK6O69QeNw=; b=vQJRRxlP/OAHY3T85IIFCXqFotkhhBX77ajOv656HWDJ6dNRUAacPuSis4E9Rj5cnP Td2MHQVQKHrR02z38kqQZjOR9MEFAZ5eaiMCuWEyDOj1o7c58vMZ30Jg+NZPmlNUn3NM 4i6vTeKJxPrVOCySlQVYgWLXwgEZwdwUMFSdGWaKtx7U07D408b/qB8/wHnJkupXEbdF 1tLFQE5eZ3a46v6Uz8xvlot+qiqJOJn/mRNj/zz9+j/bE9FW83SSyEAuvKNLUqhpPsCr wYrafTt31ZnB5vrg1zKESfLP0LD7UrqhmesHTCllaNCcBQFHvCXMx/oesp8K5JvPDWX+ 793Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=iCNsGPIH4QTiGVd9umE77TB2gJn+Cr124KK6O69QeNw=; b=B6/f/hwJYRIpFkhQRgPVqp3ui55wkgd1guRR7LtZ3A2O52C6lHFrNNx7GWL9Sosfb5 lISHVbKOvx+mR1q7S0xu3GmFvIIxENnWeC7uH8HN61Rv3uh6auE2Dz3ErCBcDe2PX2F+ bPDKHcIfgDeWCW1tYSilm35YkDQIi51hf0g9rYsM5uz5wb4QjWO9+sfZ2TSdCbf4j2zC YMCmg+pIZgpNLPSkWSzCVM/jZkC3lohszZ4sQFcCszfiYs7lB/REqsUr2CMqJnI84jyY yINzdpcVr21DclO06UK4wnEaj+PIUtdsmSUheSmOu1Pwz3bNR2pt1z9xefbwubvC5tkD 1itw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlfcEnWw4/HWhhBNGHKepT5X9DH0YWLoM1jYulb6cbOQBhGLVi fS17BAs/lws0sx6YyjprYoXWew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwCT6L9Bfeu50BDts3lktDjTrf4GLo4GNGzo0iELK92zLmTml2r/KCKsWeuJd/ADA9lpF4BEg== X-Received: by 2002:a92:1657:: with SMTP id r84mr1604375ill.5.1569442350193; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([199.229.249.165]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm381309iln.42.2019.09.25.13.12.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B20D11206A9; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:12:26 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:12:26 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: Jeff Janes , Thomas Kellerer , pgsql-hackers , Teodor Sigaev , Alexander Korotkov Subject: Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong Message-ID: <20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20591.1551378611@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk It's not clear to me what the next action should be on this patch. I think Jeff got some feedback from Tom, but was that enough to expect a new version to be posted? That was in February; should we now (in late September) close this as Returned with Feedback? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services