Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDNlM-00084J-A4 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:00:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDNlL-0008MS-5h for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:00:27 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDNlK-0008H0-IJ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:00:26 +0000 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iDNlH-0002hH-QV for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:00:24 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9966C6; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:00:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=zw/APOk7EwQ+/ETN0Rm2OSjjRzy hyaMbaiA9XlKyRIA=; b=VRJ+g6oXd8mVs30Oy9C1DHxhpjFArDI5XWlYN6vWPNP BXg8AEHQ1CkrGB6pVOaG6EXO03PScly2a5ghLTEWOmQ4IeJu4IDtxZaQJ3wHjOe/ +b2Fbfyb99jvL2iBPaL7E8kQqq74sHzeipl+8BUyuG77kFJzCfFih36Sfh4QfTuD oy9Dv85HOAWf1/T2sklfQHtSQhSMBX2qGdB3BLXA5DPnd+adL8g16uzOcuSkJA76 5qyamu4RpiGZcAfBU5tVvAQtsLxom9CN+m/0oaqd5zvnhII2Q8gmMtAyWmzckd82 oaA4ys0h644cpQHN2WRgMn0UDxrMQZJs3rG5mD8gNzQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=zw/APO k7EwQ+/ETN0Rm2OSjjRzyhyaMbaiA9XlKyRIA=; b=gm1klc1O0NcfUhGol06Ch9 AIFgyFudJZGlo/c4/H6zAbX1PzjRPBqzrZai2S5sJnKwcit+hrxLqTCIFctWNRVV nJZ23KMel59XysCEnCDruZHMjLKsw/Wp2BXihODz9KfHY3alKkJxZbnlqZtjukqI vIhG2h/GkP8ABXy9+18tlg07nRBbN4pX62lKEKPlM3jah876lOWYKb5lvag/e3hw XKPo82ClKNrgmFHvq0GFwBZva3YEJjD66f2Iadr0uOJMHQVUM8X0L1yEl5fOpE5n Yi2zNWzwcL0+jIX9IjA97DNJNA+0T3vHHOt7kirD4kSJJW+QQpl/8aAa5VpCAXuw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrfeefgdduudegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucfkphepudduuddruddtvddrudektddrudekheenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedu X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2A27D60062; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:00:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:00:12 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Tom Lane , Jeff Janes , Thomas Kellerer , pgsql-hackers , Teodor Sigaev , Alexander Korotkov Subject: Re: Bloom index cost model seems to be wrong Message-ID: <20190926070012.GC2448@paquier.xyz> References: <20591.1551378611@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190925201226.GA23098@alvherre.pgsql> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:12:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > It's not clear to me what the next action should be on this patch. I > think Jeff got some feedback from Tom, but was that enough to expect a > new version to be posted? That was in February; should we now (in late > September) close this as Returned with Feedback? That sounds rather right to me. -- Michael --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl2MYfwACgkQnvQgOdby QH1Ijg//Td+eCAhTBYyVtA53HvLAwRDJWb9vjqaijqnWwsvkOOsIQ3dLQlEgc+ZI L2oZ/CrNVKzkuyYNg22pDj13FB7XKIWwO4SUJl7pOXeG5lQifaR77x07h2oIILej MHvMp7+NHEzpWfaJ2WtucYXPADLcpEmCK1J6UDCbcU8SpRVIjNFubMGC95l3Gnmw fx02PreWBXzAOhlofkN6aqmp4VnMt3Izcr8DT8w7MDWcXmfAGT9wiTdIcgldVeOG gnkmrzWf7m/FUB7SvCyypjbJ7S7U0//syoB7prXgW2eX6VR91haoRRgGinMKvSg8 3smzZuRSiTXwinaNSvnOVG+7CV6ya4q8VqjD2Iq1MdrYtJcQjiLEfvZpFtbWmtgP A33yVFvOmA/yqpKWxquApA92aCZJuqpLgWa7IePuwfvvQWeXR1Oz71fWESrMq8Gq jIkSzjhFQndskSJZQ7/U/XWTgt/adHXVIyOepNWZUxbyiMI1XEh0eiC+HNFmGxql VuiH46uToLdnUeKrTavJ6j8aXaLO4x/K5Zh0QEK/JJrxcGnIJAFEm9IzDTHt3oml xXf9mY1pQO6ZYZLElvsUUwYQ1eScQUQzi3cTwC/Vzdw3Rg4uQrXmgLi98wE/dK4m jw9KrDIYMyDfTKanxTlPp2f7hJamicUt+GJA9Zof/407m1DECQE= =ijJu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/--