Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-performance-owner+M54947=pgsql-performance-ar@postgresql.org>)
	id 1czAps-0000jR-Ua
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:41:05 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-performance-owner+M54947=pgsql-performance-ar@postgresql.org>)
	id 1czAps-0003VH-HZ
	for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:41:04 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1czAps-0003Ut-4j
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:41:04 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1czApp-00033g-Lb
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:41:03 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v3ENewZ9020572;
	Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:40:58 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hans Braxmeier <hans.braxmeier@outlook.com>
cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.5 / 9.6: Restoring PG 9.4 dump is very very slow
In-reply-to: 
 <VI1PR04MB11364C57DD1FA57A376F4E1B99050@VI1PR04MB1136.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: 
 <VI1PR04MB11364C57DD1FA57A376F4E1B99050@VI1PR04MB1136.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Hans Braxmeier <hans.braxmeier@outlook.com>
	message dated "Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:30:10 -0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20570.1492213258.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:40:58 -0400
Message-ID: <20571.1492213258@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-performance.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-performance>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org

Hans Braxmeier <hans.braxmeier@outlook.com> writes:
> Restoring these dumps in PG 9.4 takes less than 20 minutes, restoring the=
m in PG 9.5/9.5 takes several hours on the same system (even if I make a PG=
 9.5/9.6 dumps and try to restore this one)!

Can you provide a test case demonstrating this sort of slowdown?

			regards, tom lane


--=20
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance