X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885D89DCAC2
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:39:10 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 99454-08
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:39:14 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B729DCAA9
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:39:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBC2d8lZ020806;
	Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:39:08 -0500 (EST)
To: Mike C <smith.not.western@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Table Partitions / Partial Indexes 
In-reply-to: <bd0eabd0512111807q6b54115q2477c7c2a37f1c1a@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <bd0eabd0512111807q6b54115q2477c7c2a37f1c1a@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Mike C <smith.not.western@gmail.com>
	message dated "Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:07:59 +1300"
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:39:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20805.1134355148@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003]
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200512/286
X-Sequence-Number: 16107

Mike C <smith.not.western@gmail.com> writes:
> CLUSTER on PC_TRAFFIC_IDX3 gives me significantly improved performance:

How can you tell?  Neither of these are EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.

			regards, tom lane