Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ee0TN-00082K-ST for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:26:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ee0TN-0001or-28 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:26:53 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ee0TM-0001oi-RI for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:26:52 +0000 Received: from mail.i-mark.de ([188.138.104.222]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ee0TG-0003B7-Nv for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:26:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.222.106] (p5B313E30.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.49.62.48]) by mail.i-mark.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B53291582BBE for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:26:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? To: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org References: <46D83427.60001@livedatagroup.com> <1516601350338-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <987851516614060@web46o.yandex.ru> <1516616499481-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <97fd02a3-c07c-6d27-6221-b50c2c8c13cc@a-kretschmer.de> <1516708261537-0.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Andreas Kretschmer Message-ID: <20fdd406-eef8-7fab-f3eb-9203bbfb8c10@a-kretschmer.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:26:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Am 23.01.2018 um 16:20 schrieb Pavan Teja: > Hi David, > > If it's yes what needs to be done in order to stabilize this issue?? > Don't top-post ;-) You can't prevent the generation of wal's (apart from using unlogged tables, but i'm sure, that will be not your solution.) Regards, Andreas -- 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company. www.2ndQuadrant.com