Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E779F949F for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:26:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87585-09 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:26:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2119F926D for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:26:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9Q3Q8Hf002140; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:26:08 -0400 (EDT) To: Josh Berkus cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Gregory Stark , "Jignesh K. Shah" , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris In-reply-to: <200710251956.56744.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <4720FB72.8060800@sun.com> <871wbi95nb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <29721.1193359867@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200710251956.56744.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:56:56 -0700" Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:26:08 -0400 Message-ID: <2139.1193369168@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/293 X-Sequence-Number: 27315 Josh Berkus writes: > Actually, 32 made a significant difference as I recall ... do you still have > the figures for that, Jignesh? I'd want to see a new set of test runs backing up any call for a change in NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS --- we've changed enough stuff around this area that benchmarks using code from a few months back shouldn't carry a lot of weight. regards, tom lane