Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37612E01F4
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:26:10 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 63043-06-4
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:26:06 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850272E300B
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:17:59 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0NHHuQ3022363;
	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:17:56 -0500 (EST)
To: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
cc: "Dmitry Potapov" <fortune.fish@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: planner chooses unoptimal plan on joins with complex key 
In-reply-to: <1d4e0c10801230558i1e56a9dcgaa9e6c2fac6d0448@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <878c83960801230548i6bee9353m19bcee7335220c9b@mail.gmail.com>
	<1d4e0c10801230558i1e56a9dcgaa9e6c2fac6d0448@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:58:52 +0100"
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:17:56 -0500
Message-ID: <22362.1201108676@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200801/195
X-Sequence-Number: 28434

"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> It doesn't look like an EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. Can you provide a real
> one (you should have a second set of numbers with EXPLAIN ANALYZE)?

Also, could we see the pg_stats rows for the columns being joined?

			regards, tom lane