X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA94529DA
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:14:46 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 12071-08
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:14:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1669D529C1
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:14:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5SIEgLi022416;
	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
Cc: kjelle@bingon.no, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Too slow querying a table of 15 million records 
In-reply-to: <op.ss3ba3loth1vuj@localhost> 
References: <19310.193.213.27.25.1119378838.squirrel@webmail.s7.itpays.net>
	<op.ss3ba3loth1vuj@localhost>
Comments: In-reply-to PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
	message dated "Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:10:05 +0200"
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:14:42 -0400
Message-ID: <22415.1119982482@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200506/569
X-Sequence-Number: 13206

PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com> writes:
> 	1. Use CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (which is considered a constant by the planner)  
> instead of now()

Oh?

			regards, tom lane