X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5DE9FB3F6 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:08:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73785-02 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:08:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB699FB3ED for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:08:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VJ83tv022782; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:08:03 -0400 (EDT) To: Vivek Khera cc: "Pgsql-Performance ((((E-mail))))" Subject: Re: performance problems. In-reply-to: References: <44F55A7F.40305@sorbs.net> <20060830162657.GD81373@pervasive.com> Comments: In-reply-to Vivek Khera message dated "Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:10:55 -0400" Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:08:03 -0400 Message-ID: <22781.1157051283@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/500 X-Sequence-Number: 20685 Vivek Khera writes: > Curious... See Message-ID: <20031011092308.GA39942@perrin.nxad.com> > from the October 2003 archives. (I'd provide a full link to it, but > the http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/ archives are > botched -- Still? I found it easily enough with a search for 'hibufspace': http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-10/msg00383.php regards, tom lane