X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E50BD7F83 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:42:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34352-06 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:42:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iad2.emailsrvr.com (iad2.emailsrvr.com [207.97.227.212]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE32ED7F46 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:42:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.10.20.22] (unknown [216.94.157.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: remyb@medrium.com) by relay3.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 11F7544C5E8; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:42:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200508301132.06904.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200508301132.06904.josh@agliodbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <22924e579ad7e7e0deb5133eb905618b@medrium.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9my_Beaumont?= Subject: Re: High load and iowait but no disk access Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:42:38 -0400 To: josh@agliodbs.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Scanned: OK X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests=[none] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200508/534 X-Sequence-Number: 14281 On 30-Aug-05, at 14:32, Josh Berkus wrote: > Remy, > >> The behavior we see is that when running queries that do random reads >> on disk, IOWAIT goes over 80% and actual disk IO falls to a crawl at = a >> throughput bellow 3000kB/s (We usually average 40000 kB/s to 80000=20 >> kB/s >> on sequential read operations on the netapps) > > This seems pretty low for a NetApp -- you should be able to manage up=20= > to > 180mb/s, if not higher. Are you sure it's configured correctly? Hi Josh, The config has been reviewed by NetApp. We do get rates higher then=20 80mb/s, but on average, that's what we get. Do you have NetApp filers deployed ? How many spindles do you have in your volume ? On which OS are you running Postgres ? Thanks, R=E9my > > --=20 > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of=20 > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match