X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40E49FA5D8 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:20:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22382-06 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:20:51 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C949F9CAA for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:20:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5EEKfdL023626; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:20:42 -0400 (EDT) To: Antoine cc: "Greg Stark" , "Jim C. Nasby" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: OT - select + must have from - sql standard syntax? In-reply-to: <92d3a4950606132336j1220301en9e5d33c64ad2794a@mail.gmail.com> References: <92d3a4950606130543y2aab73d8sbbbf04aee328b41f@mail.gmail.com> <20060613210246.GA34196@pervasive.com> <19096.1150253069@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87wtbkcqzh.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> <92d3a4950606132336j1220301en9e5d33c64ad2794a@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Antoine message dated "Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:36:22 +0200" Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:20:41 -0400 Message-ID: <23625.1150294841@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200606/249 X-Sequence-Number: 19606 Antoine writes: > ps. shame the standard isn't "freely" consultable to save you guys > silly OT questions! You can get free "draft" versions that are close-enough-to-final to be perfectly usable. See our developers' FAQ for some links. I like the drafts partly because they're plain ASCII, and so far easier to search than PDFs ... regards, tom lane