Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078429FB73C for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:26:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66586-05 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:26:41 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1126C9FB5C6 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:26:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4KHQcdr002439; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:26:38 -0400 (EDT) To: PFC cc: "Arjen van der Meijden" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results In-reply-to: References: <46507A40.505@tweakers.net> Comments: In-reply-to PFC message dated "Sun, 20 May 2007 19:09:38 +0200" Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:26:38 -0400 Message-ID: <2438.1179681998@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/380 X-Sequence-Number: 24770 PFC writes: > The little curve that dives into the ground is MySQL with InnoDB. > The Energizer bunny that keeps going is Postgres. Just for comparison's sake it would be interesting to see a curve for mysql/myisam. Mysql's claim to speed is mostly based on measurements taken with myisam tables, but I think that doesn't hold up very well under concurrent load. regards, tom lane