X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB39FB31F for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:27:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83675-05 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 03:27:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56269FB2C5 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:27:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k753R8g8024793; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 23:27:09 -0400 (EDT) To: Rusty Conover cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Query Plan - Bitmap Index Scan and Views In-reply-to: References: <26497C9E-3583-4EA2-A3AD-955F31E00CC3@infogears.com> <24233.1154744118@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Rusty Conover message dated "Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:56:54 -0600" Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 23:27:08 -0400 Message-ID: <24792.1154748428@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/61 X-Sequence-Number: 20246 Rusty Conover writes: > Absolutely, I'll attempt to run the test against the current CVS HEAD. > Do I need to pg_dump and restore from 8.1.4? Yup, fraid so. regards, tom lane