Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B321337B7E
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:57:38 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 36521-03
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:57:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630181336971
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:57:30 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oADEvT99024821;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:57:30 -0500 (EST)
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: do temporary tables have hint bits? 
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinDoe6sNb6X+WT0vG+pC5BEGpaCE649xT2CK0hq@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <AANLkTinDoe6sNb6X+WT0vG+pC5BEGpaCE649xT2CK0hq@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>
	message dated "Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:53:27 -0600"
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:57:29 -0500
Message-ID: <24820.1289660249@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201011/223
X-Sequence-Number: 41247

Yes.

			regards, tom lane